From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Dillow Subject: Re: IPsec performance Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 15:27:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1115148461.31573.9.camel@dillow.idleaire.com> References: <1115099678.2953.3.camel@ori.thedillows.org> <1115129839.2953.4.camel@ori.thedillows.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , Netdev Return-path: To: Miika Komu In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 19:14 +0300, Miika Komu wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dave Dillow wrote: > > 3DES is processor intensive. I'd say 1.9MB/s is reasonable for the > > hardware you are on. > > Ok. Thanks for your quick responses! I should note that I mean reasonable given the current implementation -- you're seeing performance in line with numbers on other machines. I think it's been mentioned that our 3DES implementation has not been tuned for x86, so there's probably some performance being left on the floor. I could be wrong, though. -- Dave Dillow