From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 08:59:08 -0400 Message-ID: <1115211549.7665.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4273CAB7.6080403@trash.net> <1114890709.8929.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430200848.GF577@postel.suug.ch> <1114894202.8929.165.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430215550.GH577@postel.suug.ch> <1114900485.8929.171.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430235809.GI577@postel.suug.ch> <1115035838.8929.236.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050502150632.GM577@postel.suug.ch> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , netdev , "David S. Miller" Return-path: To: Thomas Graf In-Reply-To: <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 14:31 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-04 07:46 > > tc_verd to say "clear tc_classid" and have the meta action decide if it > > is global(dont clear) or not(clear - current behavior) during > > clone/copy . Does this sound reasonable? > > I have no objections but fail to see why we want to clear it anyway? > If its scope is local i.e for one device, then not reseting could confuse the next device that sees it and tries to classify on it. cheers, jamal