From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 09:06:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1115298399.7680.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050502150632.GM577@postel.suug.ch> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504123157.GA18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115211549.7665.140.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504132822.GB18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115213600.7665.166.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504134815.GD18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115214782.7665.184.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504140540.GE18452@postel.suug.ch> <1115216629.7906.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050504145341.GG18452@postel.suug.ch> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Patrick McHardy , netdev , "David S. Miller" Return-path: To: Thomas Graf In-Reply-To: <20050504145341.GG18452@postel.suug.ch> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-04-05 at 16:53 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > * jamal <1115216629.7906.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> 2005-05-04 10:23 > > Agreed. So shall we stick then to just make it a global-only? > > As long as we can't find a way to have a well defined local > scope which is both easy to implement and easy to understand > for the user a global-only scope with the ability for the user > to reset the value via the meta action is most reasonable to me. ok - i will wait to see the patches from Patrick out first then do this. Its actually a simple change. cheers, jamal