netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [7/7] [IPSEC] Add XFRMA_SA/XFRMA_POLICY for delete notification
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 08:04:16 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1115467457.19561.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050507072349.GH5753@gondor.apana.org.au>

On Sat, 2005-07-05 at 17:23 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Hi:
> 
> This patch changes the format of the XFRM_MSG_DELSA and
> XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY notification so that the main message
> sent is of the same format as that received by the kernel
> if the original message was via netlink.  This also means
> that we won't lose the byid information carried in km_event.
> 

This is incosistent in two ways:
1) Typical netlink behavior is to return the object being deleted.
Every other netlink user behaves that way - the only exception is sone
filters in tc and this is because they cant retrieve that detail
(something that needs resolution at some point). There is nothing that
xfrm_usersa_id provides that can be found in xfrm_usersa_info.
Same for the policy.

2) You cant have one behavior when something is deleted by pfkey and a
different one when it is deleted by netlink.

So i would recommend pulling this one out.

cheers,
jamal

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-07 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-05 12:03 PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events jamal
2005-04-05 12:07 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-05 12:19   ` jamal
2005-04-05 12:24     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-04-09 10:54 ` [1/4] [IPSEC] Improve xfrm to pfkey SA state conversion Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 11:12   ` [2/4] [IPSEC] Kill spurious hard expire messages Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 11:15     ` [3/4] [IPSEC] Turn km_event.data into a union Herbert Xu
2005-04-10  7:48       ` [4/4] [IPSEC] Set byid for km_event in xfrm_get_policy Herbert Xu
2005-04-10  9:02         ` [5/*] [IPSEC] Use XFRM_MSG_* instead of XFRM_SAP_* Herbert Xu
2005-04-10  9:38           ` [6/*] [IPSEC] Add xfrm_userpolicy_delete for xfrm_user notification Herbert Xu
2005-04-10 14:15           ` [5/*] [IPSEC] Use XFRM_MSG_* instead of XFRM_SAP_* jamal
2005-04-10 21:28             ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-11  5:45             ` Masahide NAKAMURA
2005-04-11 11:26               ` jamal
2005-04-12  8:17                 ` Masahide NAKAMURA
2005-04-12 13:37                   ` jamal
2005-04-13  5:07                     ` Masahide NAKAMURA
2005-04-09 12:30     ` [2/4] [IPSEC] Kill spurious hard expire messages jamal
2005-04-09 19:29       ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-09 20:03         ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-10 14:10           ` jamal
2005-04-10 21:27             ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-11 11:20               ` jamal
2005-04-11 11:30                 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-11 11:57                   ` jamal
2005-04-11 12:08                     ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-07  7:14   ` [0/7] [IPSEC] IPsec event notification Herbert Xu
2005-05-07  7:18     ` [1/7] [IPSEC] Add complete xfrm " Herbert Xu
2005-05-07  7:18       ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-07  7:19       ` [2/7] [IPSEC] Fix xfrm to pfkey SA state conversion Herbert Xu
2005-05-07  7:20         ` [3/7] [IPSEC] Kill spurious hard expire messages Herbert Xu
2005-05-07  7:21           ` [4/7] [IPSEC] Turn km_event.data into a union Herbert Xu
     [not found]             ` <20050507072216.GF5753@gondor.apana.org.au>
     [not found]               ` <20050507072251.GG5753@gondor.apana.org.au>
     [not found]                 ` <20050507072349.GH5753@gondor.apana.org.au>
2005-05-07 12:04                   ` jamal [this message]
2005-05-07 12:25                     ` [7/7] [IPSEC] Add XFRMA_SA/XFRMA_POLICY for delete notification Herbert Xu
2005-05-07 12:46                       ` jamal
2005-05-07 19:35                         ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-08 13:56                           ` jamal
2005-05-08 21:40                             ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-09  0:06                               ` jamal
2005-05-07 14:51       ` [1/7] [IPSEC] Add complete xfrm event notification Patrick McHardy
2005-05-07 19:42         ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1115467457.19561.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=nakam@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).