From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:25:27 +0400 Message-ID: <1116570327.21310.106.camel@uganda> References: <1116510411.6240.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050519.114901.108984882.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zXmMmqNM4Ni1K8Sx1ErA" Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, jmorris@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20050519.114901.108984882.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org --=-zXmMmqNM4Ni1K8Sx1ErA Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 11:49 -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: jamal > Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:46:50 -0400 >=20 > > However, something like connector should only get one ID and it can do > > its own multiplexing based on "units". >=20 > Yes. There is no reason connector needs more than one > netlink ID. It does not require several IDs. --=20 Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski --=-zXmMmqNM4Ni1K8Sx1ErA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCjYLXIKTPhE+8wY0RAobHAJ9FgefgAFZuAWC5OiJQorvLzRLI8gCfW0UU 8q/GgJQiTCqdcCjahh0rsp0= =F+Z5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zXmMmqNM4Ni1K8Sx1ErA--