Re: 2.6.12-rc4-mm[12] - ULOG problem

[Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]

On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 07:42 -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-20-05 at 10:39 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> 
> > I just want to note, that if you want message bus, you require
> > at least oppsite direction, and thus input callback, and
> > either several socket number for each user [kobject, audit, iscsi, 
> > xfrm - all they implement what connector already does] or
> > some header and thus parser in input callback, and thus
> > some registration mechanism. 
> 
> 
> But if you are given your own ID, there should no issues, correct?

Yes.

> i.e it will be no different than say rtnetlink. Users would still have
> to subscribe to topics etc, but thats something you already handle.
> IOW, Iam hoping you are not resorting to a single socket with some user
> space mux to do filtering.

Not following, sorry.
Userspace should use the same socket as kernel - my application
previously
obtained it from dmesg and later used ULOG.

> cheers,
> jamal
> 
-- 
        Evgeniy Polyakov

Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]