From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:23:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1117830205.6071.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1117765954.6095.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1117824150.6071.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050603.120126.41874584.davem@davemloft.net> <1117827650.6071.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mitch.a.williams@intel.com, john.ronciak@intel.com, jdmason@us.ibm.com, shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1117827650.6071.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-03-06 at 15:40 -0400, jamal wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-06 at 12:01 -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > I think you are more than likely right. If we can instrument it Mitch > could check it out. Mitch would you like to try something that will > instrument this? I know i have seen this behavior but it was when i was > playing with some system that had a real small HZ. > Sorry, Its already there as Dave said in his email. Look for time_squeeze. Its the column i labeled XXXX below. ----- $ cat /proc/net/softnet_stat 0000f938 00000000 XXXXXXX 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ------ cheers, jamal