From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: RFC: NAPI packet weighting patch Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 18:21:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1118355695.12573.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E0450C01F@orsmsx408> <20050607.132159.35660612.davem@davemloft.net> <20050607.204339.21591152.davem@davemloft.net> <1118237775.6382.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050609150546.61b0fee7@unknown-215.office.pdx.osdl.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , "David S. Miller" , "Ronciak, John" , "Williams, Mitch A" , mchan@broadcom.com, buytenh@wantstofly.org, jdmason@us.ibm.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, "Venkatesan, Ganesh" Return-path: To: Jesse Brandeburg In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-09-06 at 15:12 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > 313667 4.7884 vmlinux csum_partial > > > 218870 3.3413 vmlinux _spin_lock > > > 214302 3.2715 vmlinux __copy_user_intel > > > 193662 2.9564 vmlinux skb_release_data > > > 177755 2.7136 vmlinux ipt_do_table > > > > You are probably benchmarking iptables/netfilter! How many rules do you > > have? > > I saw that... somehow iptables got compiled into kernel statically. no > rules are active or installed iptables -L -n shows nothing in any chain. Contracking is a lot worse of a problem. Just turn off netfilter all together. cheers, jamal