From: Eric Leblond <eleblond@inl.fr>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Netlink connector
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:43:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1122302623.29940.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42E4F800.1010908@trash.net>
Le lundi 25 juillet 2005 à 16:32 +0200, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:02:10AM -0400, James Morris (jmorris@redhat.com) wrote:
> If I understand correctly it tries to workaround some netlink
> limitations (limited number of netlink families and multicast groups)
> by sending everything to userspace and demultiplexing it there.
> Same in the other direction, an additional layer on top of netlink
> does basically the same thing netlink already does. This looks like
> a step in the wrong direction to me, netlink should instead be fixed
> to support what is needed.
I totally agree with you, it could be great to fix netlink to support
multiple queue.
I like to be able to use projects like snort-inline or nufw together.
This will make Netfilter really stronger.
Furthermore, there's a repetition of filtering capabilities with such a
solution. Netfilter has to filter to send to netlink and this is the
same with the queue dispatcher. I think this introduce too much
complexity.
my 0.02$
BR,
--
Éric Leblond, eleblond@inl.fr
Téléphone : 01 44 89 46 40, Fax : 01 44 89 45 01
INL, http://www.inl.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-25 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050723125427.GA11177@rama>
[not found] ` <20050723091455.GA12015@2ka.mipt.ru>
[not found] ` <20050724.191756.105797967.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <Lynx.SEL.4.62.0507250154000.21934@thoron.boston.redhat.com>
2005-07-25 7:06 ` Netlink connector Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-07-25 14:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-07-25 14:43 ` Eric Leblond [this message]
2005-07-25 19:33 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-07-26 8:45 ` Harald Welte
2005-07-25 19:28 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-07-25 23:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-07-25 23:56 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-26 0:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-07-26 0:30 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-26 4:45 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-07-26 4:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-07-26 5:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2005-07-26 6:14 ` Thomas Graf
2005-07-26 6:31 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1122302623.29940.20.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eleblond@inl.fr \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).