From: Khalid Aziz <khalid_aziz@hp.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.osdl.org,
Fastboot mailing list <fastboot@lists.osdl.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fastboot] Re: Re: tg3: issue for reboot/kexec
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:35:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124390152.2274.14.camel@lyra.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1124389821.2274.11.camel@lyra.fc.hp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3728 bytes --]
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 12:30 -0600, Khalid Aziz wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:52 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 05:21:45PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >> However I have gotten feedback a couple of times that
> > >> driver writers tend to prefer using reboot notifiers. In part
> > >> because shutdown functions don't exist for non-pci devices.
> > >
> > > That's a very lame excuse. All busses should have shutdown functions.
> > > And any device that is just bypassing all of the existing bus logic is
> > > still tying into the driver core directly (which is a bad thing by
> > > itself, but that's a different matter.) And there's a shutdown method
> > > there too.
> > >
> > > So there is no excuse to not use it. Please, if they complain, point
> > > them to me :)
> >
> > Ok.
> >
> > Then there is still my complaint and device_shutdown doesn't get called
> > on module removal which means it really doesn't get implemented. Perhaps
> > with kexec now being in the mainline kernel this will get better.
> >
> > Currently I have the following patch outstanding against the e1000
> > driver because on reboot on some boxes it card revisions
> > it places the card into a sleep state the driver initialization
> > routing cannot get the card out of.
> >
> > And yes the e1000 is bad and is using a reboot_notifier.
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > e1000_main.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff -uNr linux-2.4.29-kexec-apic-virtwire-on-shutdownx86_64/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c linux-2.4.29-e1000-no-poweroff-on-reboot/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> > --- linux-2.4.29-kexec-apic-virtwire-on-shutdownx86_64/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Tue Feb 15 14:17:09 2005
> > +++ linux-2.4.29-e1000-no-poweroff-on-reboot/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Wed Feb 16 05:49:00 2005
> > @@ -2777,7 +2777,7 @@
> > case SYS_POWER_OFF:
> > while((pdev = pci_find_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, pdev))) {
> > if(pci_dev_driver(pdev) == &e1000_driver)
> > - e1000_suspend(pdev, 3);
> > + e1000_suspend(pdev, (event == SYS_DOWN)?0:3);
> > }
> > }
> > return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> I have found that I can not walk reboot_notifier list in all cases
> before kexec'ing a new kernel. For instance, when handling INIT on ia64,
> we are running in interrupt context and atleast some of the reboot
> notifier callbacks call schedule(). Calling schedule() is not gonna work
> when we are running in interrupt context. I have the same concern for
> when panic gets called in interrupt context. So I added a shutdown
> function to e1000 driver instead. Patch is attached. This patch has
> worked for me.
>
> As soon as I have all the issues sorted out with kexec'ing on INIT on
> ia64, I will post a fully updated kexec patch for ia64. I now have kexec
> working solid on INIT with e1000 driver and it can handle multiple back
> to back INITs and come up in kexec'd kernel every time. I am now trying
> to sort some issues out with tg3 driver (another driver with no shutdown
> routine :(
>
Sorry, forgot to remove the last hunk that is already in 2.6.12. Updated
patch attached.
--
Khalid
====================================================================
Khalid Aziz Open Source and Linux Organization
(970)898-9214 Hewlett-Packard
khalid.aziz@hp.com Fort Collins, CO
"The Linux kernel is subject to relentless development"
- Alessandro Rubini
[-- Attachment #2: e1000_shutdown.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3472 bytes --]
diff -urNp hpte-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c hpte-2.6.init/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
--- hpte-2.6/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c 2005-07-08 13:57:55.000000000 -0600
+++ hpte-2.6.init/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c 2005-07-21 09:42:17.000000000 -0600
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ static void e1000_restore_vlan(struct e1
static int e1000_notify_reboot(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long event, void *ptr);
static int e1000_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, uint32_t state);
+static void e1000_shutdown(struct device *dev);
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static int e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev);
#endif
@@ -257,6 +258,8 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug level (0=
* loaded. All it does is register with the PCI subsystem.
**/
+#define REBOOT_NOTIFIER 0
+
static int __init
e1000_init_module(void)
{
@@ -266,10 +269,15 @@ e1000_init_module(void)
printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n", e1000_copyright);
+#if (!REBOOT_NOTIFIER)
+ e1000_driver.driver.shutdown = e1000_shutdown;
+#endif
ret = pci_module_init(&e1000_driver);
+#if REBOOT_NOTIFIER
if(ret >= 0) {
register_reboot_notifier(&e1000_notifier_reboot);
}
+#endif
return ret;
}
@@ -285,7 +293,9 @@ module_init(e1000_init_module);
static void __exit
e1000_exit_module(void)
{
+#if REBOOT_NOTIFIER
unregister_reboot_notifier(&e1000_notifier_reboot);
+#endif
pci_unregister_driver(&e1000_driver);
}
@@ -3197,6 +3207,71 @@ e1000_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, uint
return 0;
}
+static void
+e1000_shutdown(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
+ struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev->priv;
+ struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
+ uint32_t ctrl;
+
+ netif_device_detach(netdev);
+
+ if(netif_running(netdev)) {
+ e1000_irq_disable(adapter);
+ del_timer(&adapter->tx_fifo_stall_timer);
+ del_timer(&adapter->watchdog_timer);
+ del_timer(&adapter->phy_info_timer);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_E1000_NAPI
+ netif_poll_disable(netdev);
+#endif
+ adapter->link_speed = 0;
+ adapter->link_duplex = 0;
+ netif_carrier_off(netdev);
+ netif_stop_queue(netdev);
+ }
+
+ ctrl = E1000_READ_REG(hw, CTRL);
+
+ /* Must reset the PHY before resetting the MAC */
+ if((hw->mac_type == e1000_82541) || (hw->mac_type == e1000_82547)) {
+ E1000_WRITE_REG_IO(hw, CTRL, (ctrl | E1000_CTRL_PHY_RST));
+ mdelay(5);
+ }
+
+ /* Issue a global reset to the MAC. This will reset the chip's
+ * transmit, receive, DMA, and link units. It will not effect
+ * the current PCI configuration. The global reset bit is self-
+ * clearing, and should clear within a microsecond.
+ */
+ switch(hw->mac_type) {
+ case e1000_82544:
+ case e1000_82540:
+ case e1000_82545:
+ case e1000_82546:
+ case e1000_82541:
+ case e1000_82541_rev_2:
+ /* These controllers can't ack the 64-bit write when issuing the
+ * reset, so use IO-mapping as a workaround to issue the reset
+ */
+ E1000_WRITE_REG_IO(hw, CTRL, (ctrl | E1000_CTRL_RST));
+ break;
+ case e1000_82545_rev_3:
+ case e1000_82546_rev_3:
+ /* Reset is performed on a shadow of the control register */
+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, CTRL_DUP, (ctrl | E1000_CTRL_RST));
+ break;
+ default:
+ E1000_WRITE_REG(hw, CTRL, (ctrl | E1000_CTRL_RST));
+ break;
+ }
+
+ pci_disable_device(pdev);
+ pci_set_power_state(pdev, 0);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static int
e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-18 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <42BC9F09.1060002@us.ibm.com>
2005-06-25 0:46 ` tg3: issue for reboot/kexec randy_dunlap
2005-06-25 3:33 ` Greg KH
2005-06-30 23:21 ` [Fastboot] " Eric W. Biederman
2005-06-30 23:33 ` Greg KH
2005-06-30 23:52 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-08-18 18:30 ` Khalid Aziz
2005-08-18 18:35 ` Khalid Aziz [this message]
2005-08-18 18:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-08-18 19:06 ` Khalid Aziz
2005-07-01 1:18 ` Haren Myneni
2005-07-01 1:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1124390152.2274.14.camel@lyra.fc.hp.com \
--to=khalid_aziz@hp.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=fastboot@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).