From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.13-mm2
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:49:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1126399776l.6300l.2l@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4323753D.9030007@trash.net> (from kaber@trash.net on Sun Sep 11 02:07:25 2005)
On 09.11, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es> wrote:
> >
> >>I can not ifup an interface while iptables is using it.
> >>Is this expected behaviour ?
> >
> > Maybe it's expected, but breaking existing userspace is a serious issue.
>
> No, its not expected.
>
> >>There is a possible bug (IMHO) in Mandrake initscripts, that start iptables
> >>before network interfaces, but this had always worked.
> >>
> >>Any ideas ?
>
> What's happening when you try to set the interface up? Please
> provide output of ifup and strace of the failing command. Thanks.
werewolf:~# ifdown eth0
werewolf:~# service iptables start
Applying iptables firewall rules:
[ OK ]
werewolf:~# iptables -v -t nat -L
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 2 packets, 156 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 5 packets, 300 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 MASQUERADE all -- any eth0 anywhere anywhere
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 5 packets, 300 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
werewolf:~# iptables -v -t filter -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 257 packets, 51631 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth0 eth1 anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
0 0 ACCEPT all -- eth1 eth0 anywhere anywhere
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 251 packets, 51163 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
werewolf:~# ifup eth0
Determining IP information for eth0...Operation failed.
failed.
I traced the problem to pump, and I did a diff between strace of pump
when it works and when it doesnt (witout and with iptables started):
socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/pump.sock"}, 20) = 0
write(3, "\0\0\0\0eth0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\300"..., 4280) = 4280
-read(3, "\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4280) = 4280
-exit_group(0) = ?
-Process 7931 detached
+read(3, "\1\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4280) = 4280
+socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 4
+connect(4, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/pump.sock"}, 20) = 0
+write(4, "\0\0\0\0eth0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\300"..., 4280) = 4280
+read(4, "\1\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 4280) = 4280
+write(2, "Operation failed.\n", 18Operation failed.
+) = 18
+exit_group(1) = ?
+Process 7822 detached
pump seems to write something in the socket, try to read it again and gets
different results.
Note, my iptables are modular and I did not unload the modules, just stopped
them with 'service iptables stop'. Digging further, if I just do
iptables -t nat -F, pump works again.
Hope this helps.
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf!able!es \ It's better when it's free
Mandriva Linux release 2006.0 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.6.13-jam3 (gcc 4.0.1 (4.0.1-5mdk for Mandriva Linux release 2006.0))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-11 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20050908053042.6e05882f.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1126396015l.6300l.1l@werewolf.able.es>
2005-09-10 23:56 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Andrew Morton
2005-09-11 0:07 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 0:49 ` J.A. Magallon [this message]
2005-09-11 0:58 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 1:03 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
2005-09-11 1:22 ` 2.6.13-mm2 J.A. Magallon
2005-09-11 1:25 ` 2.6.13-mm2 Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1126399776l.6300l.2l@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).