* Adding ND to bonding?
@ 2013-06-03 14:13 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-06-03 20:53 ` Jay Vosburgh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk @ 2013-06-03 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Hi all
We're hoping one day we can move to an IPv6-only network (with some gatewaying to IPv4 land), and I wonder if it would be hard to add Neighbor Discovery Protocol to bonding as to allow for bonding on ipv6. I'm not much of a kernel coder, but for what I could see, it looks doable.
Anyone here that has looked into this?
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Adding ND to bonding?
2013-06-03 14:13 Adding ND to bonding? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
@ 2013-06-03 20:53 ` Jay Vosburgh
2013-06-04 9:33 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jay Vosburgh @ 2013-06-03 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk; +Cc: netdev
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net> wrote:
[...]
>We're hoping one day we can move to an IPv6-only network (with some
>gatewaying to IPv4 land), and I wonder if it would be hard to add
>Neighbor Discovery Protocol to bonding as to allow for bonding on
>ipv6. I'm not much of a kernel coder, but for what I could see, it looks
>doable.
I haven't tested it lately, but I'm reasonably sure that ND runs
over bonding. Is there something specific you have in mind here?
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Adding ND to bonding?
2013-06-03 20:53 ` Jay Vosburgh
@ 2013-06-04 9:33 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk @ 2013-06-04 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jay Vosburgh; +Cc: netdev
> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net> wrote:
> [...]
> >We're hoping one day we can move to an IPv6-only network (with some
> >gatewaying to IPv4 land), and I wonder if it would be hard to add
> >Neighbor Discovery Protocol to bonding as to allow for bonding on
> >ipv6. I'm not much of a kernel coder, but for what I could see, it
> >looks
> >doable.
>
> I haven't tested it lately, but I'm reasonably sure that ND runs
> over bonding. Is there something specific you have in mind here?
Perhaps I was a bit unclear about this. What I mean, is that in the active-backup mode, the method of finding whether or not a link is active, is to send an ARP request to some machine, in my case, the gateway. This won't work with an IPv6-only configuration, since there's no ARP there, only ND. For active-backup mode to work in IPv6, there needs to be added an ND mode, replacing or supplementing ARP.
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-04 9:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-03 14:13 Adding ND to bonding? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2013-06-03 20:53 ` Jay Vosburgh
2013-06-04 9:33 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).