From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Leininger Subject: Re: Timeline of IPoIB performance Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:44:57 -0700 Message-ID: <1128987897.13952.441.camel@localhost> References: <1128672413.13948.326.camel@localhost> <52br20lsei.fsf@cisco.com> <1128738350.13945.369.camel@localhost> <521x2tgrim.fsf@cisco.com> <1128986707.13945.424.camel@localhost> <52br1xdjtm.fsf@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Return-path: To: Roland Dreier In-Reply-To: <52br1xdjtm.fsf@cisco.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openib-general-bounces@openib.org Errors-To: openib-general-bounces@openib.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 16:38 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Matt> Pretty consistent. Here are a few runs with 2.6.12-rc5 > Matt> with reboots in between each run. I'm using netperf-2.3pl1. > > That's interesting. I'm guessing you're using mem-ful HCAs? Yes, I'm using mem-full HCAs. I could try reflashing the firmware for memfree if that's of interest. > > Given that your results are more stable than mine, if you're up for > it, you could install git, clone Linus's tree, and then do a git > bisect between 2.6.12-rc4 and 2.6.12-rc5 to narrow down the regression > to a single commit (if in fact that's possible). I was hoping someone else would do this. :) I'll start working on it tomorrow if no one else gets to it. Thanks, - Matt