From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Leininger Subject: Re: Timeline of IPoIB performance Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:28:26 -0700 Message-ID: <1129141706.13945.509.camel@localhost> References: <52mzle7k2i.fsf@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , openib-general@openib.org Return-path: To: Roland Dreier In-Reply-To: <52mzle7k2i.fsf@cisco.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openib-general-bounces@openib.org Errors-To: openib-general-bounces@openib.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 09:53 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > Herbert> Try reverting the changeset > > Herbert> 314324121f9b94b2ca657a494cf2b9cb0e4a28cc > > Herbert> which lies between these two points and may be relevant. > > Matt, I pulled this out of git for you. I guess Herbert is suggesting > to patch -R the below against 2.6.12-rc5: I applied your patch suggest by Herbert: http://www.mail-archive.com/openib-general%40openib.org/msg11415.html to my 2.6.12-rc5 tree and IPoIB performance improved back to the ~475 MB/s range for my EM64T system. The data is below. I'm building/testing 2.6.14-rc4 with and without this patch now. All benchmarks are with RHEL4 x86_64 with HCA FW v4.7.0 dual EM64T 3.2 GHz PCIe IB HCA (memfull) Kernel OpenIB msi_x netperf (MB/s) 2.6.14-rc3 in-kernel 1 374 2.6.13.2 svn3627 1 386 2.6.13.2 in-kernel 1 394 2.6.12.5-lustre in-kernel 1 399 2.6.12.5 in-kernel 1 402 2.6.12 in-kernel 1 406 2.6.12-rc6 in-kernel 1 407 2.6.12-rc5 in-kernel 1 405 <<<< 2.6.12-rc5 <<<< - remove changeset 314324121f9b94b2ca657a494cf2b9cb0e4a28cc <<<< in-kernel 1 474 <<<< 2.6.12-rc4 in-kernel 1 470 2.6.12-rc3 in-kernel 1 466 2.6.12-rc2 in-kernel 1 469 2.6.12-rc1 in-kernel 1 466 2.6.11 in-kernel 1 464 2.6.11 svn3687 1 464 2.6.9-11.ELsmp svn3513 1 425 (Woody's results, 3.6Ghz EM64T) - Matt