From: Michael Renzmann <netdev@nospam.otaku42.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: netdev@nospam.otaku42.de, Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
mbuesch@freenet.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Broadcom 43xx first results
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:17:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133853478.4468.9.camel@gimli> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43948B13.2090509@pobox.com>
Hi.
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 13:46 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Although I'm a bit biased towards MadWifi, I'd second your suggestion to
> > make use of the Devicescape code. The benefit of having a fully-blown
> > 802.11 stack in the kernel that drivers can make use of has been
> > discussed before, so I won't go into that yet again.
> Use the stack that's already in the kernel.
Sorry, that was my bad. I thought that the Devicescape code found its
way to the kernel (didn't follow the discussion some months ago too
closely). Although I think there probably are better alternatives to the
802.11 stack that is in the kernel right now, having a central 802.11
stack at all is a great improvement that should be used where possible.
> Encouraging otherwise hinders continued wireless progress under Linux.
That depends. If the encouraging is about an alternative, more complete
and superior 802.11 stack for Linux which could be integrated with less
effort than extending the existing code, that should be worth to talk
about.
Please note that I'm not refering here to any of the related suggestions
which have been made during the past months - it's a general statement.
Bye, Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-06 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1Eiyw4-0003Ab-FW@www1.emo.freenet-rz.de>
2005-12-05 18:00 ` Broadcom 43xx first results Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 18:14 ` Michael Renzmann
2005-12-05 18:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 18:49 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 18:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 19:11 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-06 7:17 ` Michael Renzmann [this message]
[not found] ` <20051205190038.04b7b7c1-IhiK2ZEFs2oCVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2005-12-05 18:38 ` Joseph Jezak
2005-12-05 18:55 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 19:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 19:18 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 19:53 ` Dave Jones
2005-12-05 20:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-06 15:10 ` Harald Welte
2005-12-06 19:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-07 7:16 ` Harald Welte
2005-12-06 23:19 ` David S. Miller
2005-12-06 23:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-07 13:34 ` Michael Buesch
2005-12-08 11:32 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-08 12:07 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-08 12:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-08 13:03 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 19:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-05 19:31 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 19:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-05 20:11 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-06 15:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 16:43 ` Ben Greear
2005-12-06 23:25 ` David S. Miller
2005-12-06 19:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-06 15:04 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-08 0:00 ` Michael Wu
2005-12-08 1:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 20:23 ` Michael Buesch
2005-12-05 20:42 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-06 9:26 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-06 10:23 ` Luc Saillard
2005-12-06 22:47 Jean Tourrilhes
2005-12-07 7:11 ` Jouni Malinen
2005-12-07 19:16 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2005-12-07 19:47 ` Jouni Malinen
2005-12-07 19:05 ` Jean Tourrilhes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1133853478.4468.9.camel@gimli \
--to=netdev@nospam.otaku42.de \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbuesch@freenet.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).