From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:24:07 -0500 Message-ID: <1136575448.17979.55.camel@mindpipe> References: <20060105235845.967478000@sorel.sous-sol.org> <20060106004555.GD25207@sorel.sous-sol.org> <43BE43B6.3010105@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Dipankar Sarma , "Paul E. McKenney" , Manfred Spraul , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Eric Dumazet In-Reply-To: <43BE43B6.3010105@cosmosbay.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 11:17 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > I have some servers that once in a while crashes when the ip route > cache is flushed. After > raising /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/secret_interval (so that *no* > flush is done), I got better uptime for these servers. Argh, where is that documented? I have been banging my head against this for weeks - how do I keep the kernel from flushing 4096 routes at once in softirq context causing huge (~8-20ms) latency problems? I tried all the route related sysctls I could find and nothing worked... Lee