netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Leininger <mlleinin@hpcn.ca.sandia.gov>
To: Shirley Ma <xma@us.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	openib-general@openib.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Re: TSO and IPoIB performance degradation
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 13:44:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141767891.6119.903.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF336D72E6.999D2A30-ON8725712A.00117C92-8825712A.00116629@us.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:13 -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> 
> > More likely you are getting hit by the fact that TSO prevents the
> congestion
> window from increasing properly. This was fixed in 2.6.15 (around mid
> of Nov 2005). 
> 
> Yep, I noticed the same problem. After updating to the new kernel, the
> performance are much better, but it's still lower than before.

 Here is an updated version of OpenIB IPoIB performance for various
kernels with and without one of the TSO patches.  The netperf
performance for the latest kernels has not improved the TSO performance
drop.

  Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.

  - Matt

> 
All benchmarks are with RHEL4 x86_64 with HCA FW v4.7.0
dual EM64T 3.2 GHz PCIe IB HCA (memfull)
patch 1 - remove changeset 314324121f9b94b2ca657a494cf2b9cb0e4a28cc

Kernel                OpenIB    msi_x  netperf (MB/s)  
2.6.16-rc5           in-kernel    1     367
2.6.15               in-kernel    1     382
2.6.14-rc4 patch 1   in-kernel    1     434 
2.6.14-rc4           in-kernel    1     385 
2.6.14-rc3           in-kernel    1     374 
2.6.13.2             svn3627      1     386 
2.6.13.2 patch 1     svn3627      1     446 
2.6.13.2             in-kernel    1     394 
2.6.13-rc3 patch 12  in-kernel    1     442 
2.6.13-rc3 patch 1   in-kernel    1     450 
2.6.13-rc3           in-kernel    1     395
2.6.12.5-lustre      in-kernel    1     399  
2.6.12.5 patch 1     in-kernel    1     464
2.6.12.5             in-kernel    1     402 
2.6.12               in-kernel    1     406 
2.6.12-rc6 patch 1   in-kernel    1     470 
2.6.12-rc6           in-kernel    1     407
2.6.12-rc5           in-kernel    1     405 
2.6.12-rc5 patch 1   in-kernel    1     474
2.6.12-rc4           in-kernel    1     470 
2.6.12-rc3           in-kernel    1     466 
2.6.12-rc2           in-kernel    1     469 
2.6.12-rc1           in-kernel    1     466
2.6.11               in-kernel    1     464 
2.6.11               svn3687      1     464 
2.6.9-11.ELsmp       svn3513      1     425  (Woody's results, 3.6Ghz
EM64T) 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-07 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-06 22:34 TSO and IPoIB performance degradation Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-06 22:40 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-06 22:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07  3:13   ` Shirley Ma
2006-03-07 21:44     ` Matt Leininger [this message]
2006-03-07 21:49       ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-03-07 21:53         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-08  0:11         ` Matt Leininger
2006-03-08  0:18           ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08  1:17             ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-08  1:23               ` David S. Miller
2006-03-08  1:34                 ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-08 12:53                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-08 20:53                   ` David S. Miller
2006-03-09 23:48                   ` David S. Miller
2006-03-10  0:10                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-10  0:38                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-10  7:18                       ` David S. Miller
2006-03-10  0:21                     ` Rick Jones
2006-03-10  7:23                       ` David S. Miller
2006-03-10 17:44                         ` Rick Jones
2006-03-20  9:06                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20  9:55                           ` David S. Miller
2006-03-20 10:22                             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 10:37                               ` David S. Miller
2006-03-20 11:27                                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 11:47                                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-20 11:49                                     ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-03-20 11:53                                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-20 13:35                                         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 12:04                                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-03-20 15:09                                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-03-20 18:58                                           ` Rick Jones
2006-03-20 23:00                                           ` David S. Miller
2006-04-27  4:13                                 ` Troy Benjegerdes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1141767891.6119.903.camel@localhost \
    --to=mlleinin@hpcn.ca.sandia.gov \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=xma@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).