From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell Stuart Subject: Re: [PATCH] TC: bug fixes to the "sample" clause Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:43:57 +1000 Message-ID: <1142286237.17608.7.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> References: <1139538806.15476.33.camel@ras> <1142082696.5184.53.camel@jzny2> <1142225063.14909.77.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <1142269090.5242.29.camel@jzny2> <4415B217.30507@trash.net> <20060313100421.7df7f9ed@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hadi@cyberus.ca, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Return-path: To: Stephen Hemminger In-Reply-To: <20060313100421.7df7f9ed@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl Errors-To: lartc-bounces@mailman.ds9a.nl List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:04 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The memset fix is in current CVS. I just wasn't going to take the > patch that looked at utsname to decide what hash to use. Stephen, could you describe your objections to it please?