From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, softmac-dev@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] softmac: return -EAGAIN from getscan while scanning
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 08:14:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1144930441.2372.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1144920890.4187.50.camel@localhost>
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 11:34 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 11:06 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> > > It's very likely that tools do indeed loop when they see EAGAIN, but
> > > this is a workaround, not the main mode of operation. It seems obvious
> > > to me that the get method should wait until the scan results are
> > > available. Perhaps the discussion had a specific scenario where
> > > EAGAIN would make sense, but I cannot imagine what it might be.
> >
> > Right, they do loop, but they don't have a method to indicate
> > completion. Thus we'd have to actually wait for the completion in the
> > kernel. Jean, what is the intended use here?
>
> Hah, never mind, I guess we're just supposed to send SIOCGIWSCAN. Will
> send a patch in a minute.
No, you should be doing both really. If you don't do EAGAIN, then tools
like iwlist and other simple ones that don't want to spend 100 lines of
code in netlink message processing just to receive the wireless event
won't work very well.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-13 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060411085805.949313000@sipsolutions.net>
2006-04-13 0:42 ` [patch 4] softmac: fix event sending Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <20060411085841.252064000@sipsolutions.net>
2006-04-13 9:00 ` [patch 1/3] softmac: return -EAGAIN from getscan while scanning Pete Zaitcev
2006-04-13 9:06 ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-13 9:34 ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-13 12:14 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2006-04-13 16:13 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2006-04-15 19:24 ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-15 21:27 ` Dan Williams
2006-04-13 12:12 ` Dan Williams
2006-04-13 12:19 ` Johannes Berg
2006-04-13 16:00 ` Jouni Malinen
2006-04-13 22:28 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-04-13 22:45 ` Jouni Malinen
2006-04-13 23:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-04-13 23:35 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-04-13 22:21 ` Pete Zaitcev
2006-04-13 9:41 ` [patch 5] softmac: report when scanning has finished Johannes Berg
2006-04-13 12:15 ` Dan Williams
2006-04-13 23:58 [patch 1/3] softmac: return -EAGAIN from getscan while scanning Jean Tourrilhes
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-14 0:01 Jean Tourrilhes
2006-04-14 15:58 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1144930441.2372.12.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=softmac-dev@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).