From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] softmac: return -EAGAIN from getscan while scanning Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:27:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1145136436.5963.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060411085805.949313000@sipsolutions.net> <20060411085841.252064000@sipsolutions.net> <20060413020010.2ab16d7b.zaitcev@redhat.com> <1144919176.4187.44.camel@localhost> <1144920890.4187.50.camel@localhost> <1144930441.2372.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060413161359.GA21074@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <1145129056.6560.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, Pete Zaitcev , netdev@vger.kernel.org, softmac-dev@sipsolutions.net Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:26501 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751622AbWDOVbV (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:31:21 -0400 To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1145129056.6560.0.camel@localhost> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 21:24 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 09:13 -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > > Yes, Dan is 100% correct. > > Right, slightly later I posted a patch to do it that way. After everyone > else has discussed, do we agree to leave the patches as they are now? Current patch set looks good to me. Dan