From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Rough VJ Channel Implementation - vj_core.patch Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:10:22 +1000 Message-ID: <1146269423.8029.65.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1146212660.8029.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060428.122102.76435590.davem@davemloft.net> <1146261844.8029.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060428.153833.68265167.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: caitlinb@broadcom.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, kelly@au1.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:19121 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932464AbWD2AKv (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:10:51 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20060428.153833.68265167.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 15:38 -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Rusty Russell > Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:04:04 +1000 > > > You're still thinking you can bypass classifiers for established > > sockets, but I really don't think you can. I think the simplest > > solution is to effectively remove from (or flag) the established & > > listening hashes anything which could be effected by classifiers, so > > those packets get send through the default channel. > > OK, when rules are installed, the socket channel mappings are > flushed. This is your idea right? Yeah. First off, all flushed. Later on, we get selective. Rusty. -- ccontrol: http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ccontrol