netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: Jason Lunz <lunz@falooley.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hardware button support for Wireless cards
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 15:12:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1147720370.3067.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605151801.06379.mb@bu3sch.de>

On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 18:01 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Monday 15 May 2006 17:27, you wrote:
> > mwallis@serialmonkey.com said:
> > > Some people are saying that instead of throwing and ACPI event we should be
> > > either use hotplug or internally just disable the radio and somehow inform
> > > the dscape stack that the radio has been disabled.
> > >
> > > What are peoples thoughts here, should we 
> > >
> > > A. be handling this within our drivers and doing "what the user expects" and
> > > disabling the hardware radio, or 
> > 
> > On my HP laptop with bcm43xx wireless, the button disables the radio in
> > HARDWARE, and afaict the driver has no idea about it. The driver notices
> > that it's not connected and happily starts scanning again, unaware that
> > anything is wrong.
> 
> There are registers on the bcm43xx chip (0x158 and 0x49A) that indicate
> some "Radio is hardware-disabled" state. We currently don't use that flag
> correctly in the driver. Could you please assist me on testing if your switch
> actually toggles the bit?
> I think best place for this would be on irc.freenode.net #bcm-users

When those bits get set in the register, is the radio already disabled?
ie, for the bcm43xx chip, is it really force-disabled by the button, or
does the driver have some control?

Dan



  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-15 19:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-15 12:57 Hardware button support for Wireless cards Mark Wallis
2006-05-15 13:25 ` Jiri Benc
2006-05-15 13:59   ` Ivo van Doorn
2006-05-15 14:06 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-05-15 14:37 ` Dan Williams
2006-05-15 15:12   ` Ivo van Doorn
2006-05-15 16:20     ` Jouni Malinen
2006-05-16  3:10       ` Mark Wallis
2006-05-25 15:15         ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] " Ivo van Doorn
2006-05-15 16:19   ` David Zeuthen
2006-05-15 15:27 ` Jason Lunz
2006-05-15 16:01   ` Michael Buesch
2006-05-15 19:12     ` Dan Williams [this message]
2006-05-15 19:32       ` Michael Buesch
2006-05-15 19:46       ` Jason Lunz
2006-05-15 21:42         ` Ivo van Doorn
2006-05-15 20:08   ` John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1147720370.3067.14.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=lunz@falooley.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).