From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: wireless (was Re: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans) Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:48:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1149511707.3111.57.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <20060604135011.decdc7c9.akpm@osdl.org> <20060605010636.GB17361@havoc.gtf.org> <20060605085451.GA26766@infradead.org> <20060605123304.GA6066@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:3302 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751072AbWFEMsk (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:48:40 -0400 To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <20060605123304.GA6066@havoc.gtf.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > > It's a good thing I pay attention to this issue, too, Mr. Just Go Ahead > And Merge It. dude, name calling is way out of line here. Why is it a good thing you are blocking this driver? Do you have ANY indication AT ALL that there is anything fishy about it? (and don't say "they didn't follow cleanroom procedure", because you know that cleanroom is not the only way to do reverse engineering properly). Paying attention to proper reverse engineering is good. Being overzealous is not.