From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: wireless (was Re: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans) Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:24:51 +0100 Message-ID: <1149524691.30554.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060604135011.decdc7c9.akpm@osdl.org> <20060605010636.GB17361@havoc.gtf.org> <20060605085451.GA26766@infradead.org> <20060605132732.GA23350@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jeff Garzik , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:49804 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751208AbWFEQK0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:10:26 -0400 To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <20060605132732.GA23350@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Ar Llu, 2006-06-05 am 09:27 -0400, ysgrifennodd John W. Linville: > Does not the Signed-off-by: line on a patch submission give us some > level of "good faith" protection? > > I'm tempted to take contributors at their word, that they have produced > their own work and not copied from others. What else do we need? To keep an eye out for problems. Given the questions raised the tiacx people need to clarify their position and someone needs to look into it. Until that is done it certainly isn't "good faith" any more. Alan