From: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
"Garzik, Jeff" <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Brandeburg,
Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Kok, Auke" <auke@foo-projects.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:23:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1149787436.2928.9.camel@strongmad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060607185440.GC26702@tuxdriver.com>
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 11:54 -0700, John W. Linville wrote:
> Pedantic objection, but I think this would read easier w/o the extra
> newline before disable_irq.
Heh. I prefer to have a newline between declarations and code. The
real problem is the position of the #ifdef -- that's what makes it
difficult to read. The other solution would be
{
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
#ifdef CONFIG_E1000_NAPI
int budget = 0;
#endif
disable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
#ifdef CONFIG_E1000_NAPI
< all that stuff >
#else
<rest of the stuff >
#endif
}
Which I think is worse to read.
-Mitch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-08 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-05 23:09 [PATCH 0/2] e1000: fixes for netpoll+NAPI, ARM Kok, Auke
2006-06-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] e1000: fix netpoll with NAPI Kok, Auke
2006-06-06 13:52 ` Neil Horman
2006-06-06 16:39 ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-06 17:05 ` Neil Horman
2006-06-06 17:18 ` Auke Kok
2006-06-06 17:30 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-06 17:34 ` Auke Kok
2006-06-06 17:42 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-06 23:17 ` Matt Mackall
2006-06-07 15:05 ` Neil Horman
2006-06-07 16:48 ` Matt Mackall
2006-06-07 18:25 ` Auke Kok
2006-06-07 18:44 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-07 19:18 ` Neil Horman
2006-06-08 17:19 ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-08 17:29 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-12 0:13 ` Neil Horman
2006-06-12 16:42 ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-12 18:06 ` Neil Horman
2006-06-14 20:41 ` Neil Horman
2006-06-14 23:44 ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-15 12:44 ` John W. Linville
2006-06-15 20:45 ` Mitch Williams
2006-06-20 8:28 ` Andrew Grover
2006-06-07 18:54 ` John W. Linville
2006-06-08 17:23 ` Mitch Williams [this message]
2006-06-08 18:39 ` John W. Linville
2006-06-06 17:29 ` Jeff Moyer
2006-06-05 23:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] e1000: remove risky prefetch on next_skb->data Kok, Auke
2006-06-05 23:21 ` Rick Jones
2006-06-06 0:12 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2006-06-06 0:16 ` Rick Jones
2006-06-06 0:22 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-06 0:26 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1149787436.2928.9.camel@strongmad \
--to=mitch.a.williams@intel.com \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=auke@foo-projects.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).