From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Tucker Subject: Re: RDMA will be reverted Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:56:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1151506560.13315.3.camel@trinity.ogc.int> References: <20060628.000715.95062023.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rolandd@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Return-path: Received: from es335.com ([67.65.19.105]:3894 "EHLO mail.es335.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932559AbWF1OuC (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 10:50:02 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060628.000715.95062023.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 00:07 -0700, David Miller wrote: > Roland, there is no way in the world we would have let support for > RDMA into the kernel tree had we seen and reviewed it on netdev. I've > discussed this with Andrew Morton, and we'd like you to please revert > all of the RDMA code from Linus's tree immedialtely. > > Folks are well aware how against RDMA and TOE type schemes the Linux > networking developers are. So the fact that none of these RDMA > changes went up for review on netdev strikes me as just a little bit > more than suspicious. > > Please do not do this again, thank you. I believe Roland is on vacation (they just had a baby..). It is my belief that everything that Roland submitted went through both netdev and lklm reviews. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html