From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/15] pcmcia: hostap_cs.c - 0xc00f, 0x0000 conflicts with pcnet_cs Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:57:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1151945829.26514.5.camel@dv> References: <20060630195217.GB9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <20060630195255.GC9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <20060630195358.GD9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <20060630195439.GE9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <20060630195501.GF9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <20060630195600.GG9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <20060630195657.GH9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <20060630195753.GI9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <20060630195920.GJ9095@dominikbrodowski.de> <1151702323.21767.3.camel@dv> <20060703085603.GA9465@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, hostap@shmoo.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, jkmaline@cc.hut.fi Return-path: Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]:42113 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158AbWGCQ51 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2006 12:57:27 -0400 Received: from proski by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1FxRjh-0004aZ-VL for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:57:26 -0400 To: Dominik Brodowski In-Reply-To: <20060703085603.GA9465@dominikbrodowski.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Dominik, On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 10:56 +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Like this? Yes, but I usually drop revisions from the matched IDs, especially in presence of the chip ID. Why would we exclude "RevB" if it happens to be ISL37300P based? So the new entries would be: PCMCIA_DEVICE_PROD_ID123( "Allied Telesyn", "AT-WCL452 Wireless PCMCIA Radio", "Ver. 1.00", 0x5cd01705, 0x4271660f, 0x9d08ee12), PCMCIA_DEVICE_PROD_ID123( "corega", "WL PCCL-11", "ISL37300P", 0xa21501a, 0x59868926, 0xc9049a39), -- Regards, Pavel Roskin