netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] SNMPv2 tcpAttemptFails counter error
@ 2006-07-05  9:19 Wei Yongjun
  2006-07-24 21:22 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yongjun @ 2006-07-05  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

Refer to RFC2012, tcpAttemptFails is defined as following:
  tcpAttemptFails OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Counter32
      MAX-ACCESS  read-only
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
              "The number of times TCP connections have made a direct
              transition to the CLOSED state from either the SYN-SENT
              state or the SYN-RCVD state, plus the number of times TCP
              connections have made a direct transition to the LISTEN
              state from the SYN-RCVD state."
      ::= { tcp 7 }

When I lookup into RFC793, I found that the state change should occured
under following condition:
  1. SYN-SENT -> CLOSED
     a) Received ACK,RST segment when SYN-SENT state.

  2. SYN-RCVD -> CLOSED
     b) Received SYN segment when SYN-RCVD state(came from LISTEN).
     c) Received RST segment when SYN-RCVD state(came from SYN-SENT).
     d) Received SYN segment when SYN-RCVD state(came from SYN-SENT).

  3. SYN-RCVD -> LISTEN
     e) Received RST segment when SYN-RCVD state(came from LISTEN).

In my test, those direct state transition can not be counted to
tcpAttemptFails. Following is my patch:

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c	2006-06-30 13:37:38.000000000 -0400
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c	2006-07-05 04:45:04.000000000 -0400
@@ -4089,6 +4089,7 @@ static int tcp_rcv_synsent_state_process
 		 */
 
 		if (th->rst) {
+			TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 			tcp_reset(sk);
 			goto discard;
 		}
@@ -4377,6 +4378,8 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *s
 
 	/* step 2: check RST bit */
 	if(th->rst) {
+		if(sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
+			TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 		tcp_reset(sk);
 		goto discard;
 	}
@@ -4390,6 +4393,8 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *s
 	 *	Check for a SYN in window.
 	 */
 	if (th->syn && !before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
+		if(sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
+			TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 		NET_INC_STATS_BH(LINUX_MIB_TCPABORTONSYN);
 		tcp_reset(sk);
 		return 1;
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c	2006-06-30 13:37:38.000000000 -0400
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c	2006-07-05 04:45:04.000000000 -0400
@@ -592,8 +592,10 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *
 		/* RFC793: "second check the RST bit" and
 		 *	   "fourth, check the SYN bit"
 		 */
-		if (flg & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN))
+		if (flg & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN)) {
+			TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 			goto embryonic_reset;
+		}
 
 		/* ACK sequence verified above, just make sure ACK is
 		 * set.  If ACK not set, just silently drop the packet.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] SNMPv2 tcpAttemptFails counter error
  2006-07-05  9:19 [PATCH] SNMPv2 tcpAttemptFails counter error Wei Yongjun
@ 2006-07-24 21:22 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2006-07-24 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yjwei; +Cc: netdev

From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:19:54 -0400

> In my test, those direct state transition can not be counted to
> tcpAttemptFails. Following is my patch:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>

This change can be implemented more simply, I believe.

Except for the tcp_minisocks.c change, all the paths
changed go to tcp_done() which is what actually transfers
the state to TCP_CLOSE.  Therefore, tcp_done() can
simply be modified to check if the current state is
TCP_SYN_RECV, and is so bump the counter.

Once you implement it this way, please audit all call paths
to make sure we don't now bump this counter twice.

Thank you.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] SNMPv2 tcpAttemptFails counter error
@ 2006-07-28 11:40 Wei Yongjun
  2006-07-31  3:36 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yongjun @ 2006-07-28 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Miller; +Cc: netdev

I have changed my patch with your advice and it looks more effective.

On Monday 24 July 2006 17:22, David Miller wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>
> Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 05:19:54 -0400
>
> > In my test, those direct state transition can not be counted to
> > tcpAttemptFails. Following is my patch:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>
>
> This change can be implemented more simply, I believe.
>
> Except for the tcp_minisocks.c change, all the paths
> changed go to tcp_done() which is what actually transfers
> the state to TCP_CLOSE.  Therefore, tcp_done() can
> simply be modified to check if the current state is
> TCP_SYN_RECV, and is so bump the counter.
>
> Once you implement it this way, please audit all call paths
> to make sure we don't now bump this counter twice.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>

--- a/include/net/tcp.h	2006-07-28 16:19:14.492052104 -0400
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h	2006-07-28 16:22:03.414372008 -0400
@@ -904,6 +904,9 @@ static inline void tcp_set_state(struct 
 
 static inline void tcp_done(struct sock *sk)
 {
+	if(sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT || sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV)
+		TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
+
 	tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
 	tcp_clear_xmit_timers(sk);
 
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c	2006-07-28 16:23:21.677474208 -0400
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c	2006-07-28 16:23:48.854342696 -0400
@@ -437,7 +437,6 @@ void tcp_v4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32
 			       It can f.e. if SYNs crossed.
 			     */
 		if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
-			TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 			sk->sk_err = err;
 
 			sk->sk_error_report(sk);
@@ -855,7 +854,6 @@ int tcp_v4_conn_request(struct sock *sk,
 drop_and_free:
 	reqsk_free(req);
 drop:
-	TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 	return 0;
 }
 
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c	2006-07-28 16:23:55.862277328 -0400
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c	2006-07-28 16:25:18.263750400 -0400
@@ -592,8 +592,10 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *
 		/* RFC793: "second check the RST bit" and
 		 *	   "fourth, check the SYN bit"
 		 */
-		if (flg & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN))
+		if (flg & (TCP_FLAG_RST|TCP_FLAG_SYN)) {
+			TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 			goto embryonic_reset;
+		}
 
 		/* ACK sequence verified above, just make sure ACK is
 		 * set.  If ACK not set, just silently drop the packet.
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c	2006-07-28 16:25:36.651954968 -0400
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c	2006-07-28 16:26:00.808282648 -0400
@@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ static void tcp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *s
 	case TCP_SYN_RECV:  /* Cannot happen.
 			       It can, it SYNs are crossed. --ANK */ 
 		if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
-			TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 			sk->sk_err = err;
 			sk->sk_error_report(sk);		/* Wake people up to see the error (see connect in sock.c) */
 
@@ -815,7 +814,6 @@ drop:
 	if (req)
 		reqsk_free(req);
 
-	TCP_INC_STATS_BH(TCP_MIB_ATTEMPTFAILS);
 	return 0; /* don't send reset */
 }
 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] SNMPv2 tcpAttemptFails counter error
  2006-07-28 11:40 Wei Yongjun
@ 2006-07-31  3:36 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2006-07-31  3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yjwei; +Cc: netdev

From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:40:37 -0400

> I have changed my patch with your advice and it looks more effective.
 ...
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@nanjing-fnst.com>

This looks very nice, patch applied.  Thank you very much.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-31  3:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-05  9:19 [PATCH] SNMPv2 tcpAttemptFails counter error Wei Yongjun
2006-07-24 21:22 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-28 11:40 Wei Yongjun
2006-07-31  3:36 ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).