From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zhu Yi Subject: Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:39:58 +0800 Message-ID: <1152679198.3496.99.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> References: <20060710152032.GA8540@elf.ucw.cz> <44B2940A.2080102@pobox.com> <200607102305.06572.mb@bu3sch.de> <20060711133227.GA1650@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Buesch , Jeff Garzik , jketreno@linux.intel.com, Netdev list , linville@tuxdriver.com, kernel list Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:60563 "EHLO orsmga101-1.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932191AbWGLEky (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:40:54 -0400 To: Pavel Machek In-Reply-To: <20060711133227.GA1650@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 15:32 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Probably not. This (very dirty) hack implements that (with some level > of success -- ifconfig down/ifconfig up is enough to get wireless > working). You just need to $ iwpriv ethX reset Thanks, -yi