From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xensource.com>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 32/33] Add the Xen virtual network device driver.
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:39:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1153226379.5283.51.camel@jzny2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1153218477.3038.46.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 12:27 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> Hmmm maybe it's me, but something bugs me if a NIC driver is going to
> send IP level ARP packets... that just feels very very wrong and is a
> blatant layering violation....
It is but the bonding driver has been setting precedence for years now
on sending ARPs from a driver;->
It does make a lot of sense to put it in user space. More interesting
policies may include sending more than just ARPs and once you hard-code
in the kernel you loose that flexibility.
> shouldn't the ifup/ifconfig scripts just
> be fixed instead if this is critical behavior?
>
I dont think the ifup/ifconfig provide operational status (i.e link
up/down) - or do they? If they can be made to invoke scripts in such
a case then we are set.
Note: you will get netlink events when devices are created or devices
change their admin (via ifconfig) or operational (link down/up) status.
[Try running "ip monitor" to see]
One could write a little daemon that reacts to these specific events.
The problem has been some people claiming that daemons are a bad idea
from a usability perspective. Patrick has mentioned he may be working on
a daemon in user space that does exactly that. The other alternative is
to do the udev thing and have the kernel invoke a script whenever an
event of interest happens.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-18 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060718091807.467468000@sous-sol.org>
2006-07-18 7:00 ` [RFC PATCH 32/33] Add the Xen virtual network device driver Chris Wright
2006-07-18 10:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-18 10:35 ` Keir Fraser
2006-07-18 10:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-18 12:18 ` Dave Boutcher
2006-07-18 12:39 ` jamal [this message]
2006-07-18 13:08 ` Herbert Xu
2006-07-18 13:25 ` John Haller
2006-07-18 15:22 ` Herbert Xu
2006-07-18 15:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-07-19 3:55 ` Herbert Xu
2006-07-18 20:42 ` David Miller
2006-07-18 21:09 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1153226379.5283.51.camel@jzny2 \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ian.pratt@xensource.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).