RE: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL

[jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>]

Russell,
I apologize i havent followed the latest discussion to the detail.
My understanding of Patricks work was it solved the ATM problem as well.
I think he is busy somewhere - lets give him an opportunity to respond
and i will try to catchup with the thread as well.

cheers,
jamal

On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 12:06 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 10:13 -0400, jamal wrote:
> > And yes, I was arguing that the tc scheme you describe would not be so
> > bad either if the cost of making a generic change is expensive.
> <snip>
> > Patrick seems to have a simple way to compensate generically for link
> > layer fragmentation, so i will not argue the practically; hopefully that
> > settles it? ;->
> 
> Things seem to have died down.  Patrick's patch seemed 
> unrelated to ATM to me.  I did put up another suggestion, 
> but I don't think anybody was too impressed with the 
> idea.  So that leave the current ATM patch as the only 
> one we have on the table that addresses the ATM issue.
> 
> Since you don't think it is "too bad", can we proceed 
> with it?
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>