From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:35:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1153229710.5283.103.camel@jzny2> References: <1150278004.26181.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1150286766.5233.15.camel@jzny2> <1150287983.3246.27.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <1150292693.5197.1.camel@jzny2> <1150843471.17455.2.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <15653CE98281AD4FBD7F70BCEE3666E53CD54A@comxexch01.comx.local> <1151000966.5392.34.camel@jzny2> <1151066247.4217.254.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <1151158431.6716.95.camel@jzny2> <1153188409.13145.5.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger , Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from mailhub.znyx.com ([208.2.156.141]:10765 "EHLO mailhub.znyx.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932202AbWGRNhh (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:37:37 -0400 To: Russell Stuart In-Reply-To: <1153188409.13145.5.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Russell, I apologize i havent followed the latest discussion to the detail. My understanding of Patricks work was it solved the ATM problem as well. I think he is busy somewhere - lets give him an opportunity to respond and i will try to catchup with the thread as well. cheers, jamal On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 12:06 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 10:13 -0400, jamal wrote: > > And yes, I was arguing that the tc scheme you describe would not be so > > bad either if the cost of making a generic change is expensive. > > > Patrick seems to have a simple way to compensate generically for link > > layer fragmentation, so i will not argue the practically; hopefully that > > settles it? ;-> > > Things seem to have died down. Patrick's patch seemed > unrelated to ATM to me. I did put up another suggestion, > but I don't think anybody was too impressed with the > idea. So that leave the current ATM patch as the only > one we have on the table that addresses the ATM issue. > > Since you don't think it is "too bad", can we proceed > with it? > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >