netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: a1 <a1k@mail.ru>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: e1000 speed/duplex error
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:22:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154434920.5170.100.camel@jzny2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <595776532.20060801160328@mail.ru>

On Tue, 2006-01-08 at 16:03 +0400, a1 wrote:

> I thought the common behavior is that if one side force any particular
> parameter, other side should "sense" that and go to that mode too.
> 

You _cannot_ depend on that behavior at all. IOW, if one side is not
forced the other side's setting is undefined and falls back to whatever
that side defines as "default"

> In current case there is misunderstanding - one side (linux box)
> reports 100/FD and other (switch) reports 100/HD.
> 
> Maybe I don't understand something...

You must force both sides for predictable behavior. I would say that
doing HD as default is more common. So Linux may need to change just
that one bit.

cheers,
jamal



  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-01 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-01 10:18 e1000 speed/duplex error a1
2006-08-01 11:20 ` Jeff Kirsher
2006-08-01 12:03   ` Re[2]: " a1
2006-08-01 12:21     ` Andy Gospodarek
2006-08-01 12:22     ` Jamal Hadi Salim [this message]
2006-08-01 17:03     ` Rick Jones
     [not found]   ` <793732866.20060801153230@mail.ru>
     [not found]     ` <9929d2390608010445w4fd81b64g310ae90a423e1a7d@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-01 12:20       ` Re[4]: " a1
2006-08-01 12:34         ` Jeff Kirsher
2006-08-01 14:35           ` Auke Kok
2006-08-01 17:15             ` Jeff Kirsher
2006-08-02  7:34             ` a1
2006-08-02  7:43               ` Jeff Kirsher
2006-08-02  8:39                 ` a1
2006-08-02 15:02                   ` Auke Kok
2006-08-03  7:51                     ` a1
2006-08-02 16:19               ` Auke Kok

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1154434920.5170.100.camel@jzny2 \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=a1k@mail.ru \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tarbal@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).