public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@balabit.hu>
To: "Stephen J. Bevan" <stephen@dino.dnsalias.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	shemminger@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch] RFC: matching interface groups
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:08:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1154632139.6333.5.camel@bzorp.balabit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17617.30375.336813.199864@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 21:08 -0700, Stephen J. Bevan wrote:
> Balazs Scheidler writes:
>  > I would like to easily match a set of dynamically created interfaces
>  > from my packet filter rules. The attached patch forms the basis of my
>  > implementation and I would like to know whether something like this is
>  > mergeable to mainline.
> [snip]
>  > The implementation:
>  > 
>  > Each interface can belong to a single "group" at a time, an interface
>  > comes up without being a member in any of the groups.
> 
> You can get a similar effect by (ab)using the iflink field i.e. set
> the iflink to the parent interface and modify
> ip_tables.c:ip_packet_match to check the ifindex (or iflink if
> defined) for a match.  An advantage of this is that it doesn't require
> adding any new fields and the only kernel change is to
> ip_tables.c:ip_packet_match (and its caller).  That said, an explicit
> group (or zone as various firewall vendors call it) is cleaner.

I could hack a solution together, but I'd prefer to do this cleanly,
preferably as a patch in mainline. I would like to incorporate this
functionality in our product.

-- 
Bazsi


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-03 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-01 17:10 [patch] RFC: matching interface groups Balazs Scheidler
2006-08-01 18:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-02  7:18   ` Balazs Scheidler
2006-08-01 18:46 ` Phil Oester
2006-08-01 19:18   ` Sven Schuster
2006-08-02  7:04     ` Balazs Scheidler
2006-08-02  9:01       ` Amin Azez
2006-08-03 12:57       ` Gerd v. Egidy
2006-08-03  4:08 ` Stephen J. Bevan
2006-08-03 19:08   ` Balazs Scheidler [this message]
2006-08-04 10:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-08-07 11:44   ` Balazs Scheidler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1154632139.6333.5.camel@bzorp.balabit \
    --to=bazsi@balabit.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    --cc=stephen@dino.dnsalias.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox