From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
To: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tg3: Fix tx race condition
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:05:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155006336.5328.24.camel@rh4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060808025117.GA13077@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 12:51 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > 2. Eliminate the private tx_lock altogether and rely solely on
> > netif_tx_lock. This eliminates one spinlock in tg3_start_xmit()
> > when the ring is full.
>
> Why not get rid of the lock altogether? By making sure memory
> barriers are present on the stop/wake paths the locks are not
> needed anymore.
Without the lock, I think you can still wake the queue with an empty
ring in some cases. Although we handle it properly by returning
NETDEV_TX_BUSY, it is considered a BUG condition in tg3.
>
> > 4. Make tx_cons and tx_prod volatile to guarantee that
> > tg3_start_xmit() and tg3_tx() will see the latest ring indices.
>
> Such uses of volatile are bad inside the kernel because they
> don't actually provide hardware memory barriers and their effect
> on the compiler are given by constructs such as mb() anyway.
>
Just trying to prevent the compiler from optimizing the code. In cases
where we need hardware barriers we use mb.
> So we should simply add memory barriers where needed.
>
I can do that. It will be more mb() scattered in the driver. Actually,
I can probably hide it in the TX_BUFFS_AVAIL() macro.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-08 3:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-08 2:46 [PATCH] tg3: Fix tx race condition Michael Chan
2006-08-08 2:51 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-08 3:05 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2006-08-08 3:05 ` David Miller
2006-08-08 4:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Chan
2006-08-08 4:21 ` David Miller
2006-08-08 4:23 ` Herbert Xu
2006-08-08 4:46 ` David Miller
2006-08-08 3:04 ` [PATCH] " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1155006336.5328.24.camel@rh4 \
--to=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).