netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Russell Stuart <russell-tcatm@stuart.id.au>
Cc: lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 07:33:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1155123221.5130.23.camel@jzny2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1155074476.4270.16.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube>

On Wed, 2006-09-08 at 08:01 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 09:06 +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > It has gone quiet again.  In my mind the one unresolved issue
> > is whether Patrick intended to remove RTAB with his patch.
> > If not, the ATM patch as it stands will have to go in.
> > 
> > Patrick - it would be nice to hear from you.
> 
> It appears Patrick isn't going to reply.  The situation as
> I see it is:
> 
> - Patrick's last post said his STAB patch wasn't going to
>   touch RTAB, so regardless of whether Patrick's STAB
>   patch proceeds or not the ATM patch will be needed to
>   make the current kernel work with ATM.
> 
> - If I read Jesper's last post correctly, he said Patrick
>   acknowledged to him in a private email that RTAB had to 
>   change to accommodate ATM, and in fact called it a bug
>   in RTAB.  Fixing this "bug" is what the kernel part of
>   the current ATM patch does - and it does it in a 
>   backward compatible way.
> 
> - Jamal, you said that this ATM patch should go in if 
>   Patrick didn't come up with a better solution.
> 
> Jamal - unless there are other outstanding issues I have 
> missed or someone has had second thoughts this means you
> should be OK with the patch going in.  Can we get it into
> Dave M's tree now?

Hi Russell,

My apologies; at some point i lost track of the discussion because
things seemed under control. 
Lets hear from Patrick - I have a lot of faith in him; i just happen to
know he is occupied elsewhere as we speak (which may explain his
silence). So please be a little patient with him. In the meantime please
dont be discouraged in continuing to contribute - sometimes this is how
things go.

You are right that if there is no generic solution from Patrick we
should not hold your patch. My understanding of Patrick's patch is it
covers for your case; i may have misread that given you and him are
still discussing the differences. 

Perhaps one approach is to push your patch in first and then when
Patrick is ready he can operate on that. Patrick, thoughts?

cheers,
jamal


  reply	other threads:[~2006-08-09 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-14  9:40 [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-06-14 12:06 ` jamal
2006-06-14 12:55   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-06-15 12:57     ` jamal
2006-06-15 13:16     ` jamal
2006-06-20  1:04       ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-20 14:59         ` jamal
2006-06-20 15:16           ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-21 12:21             ` Krzysztof Matusik
2006-06-21 12:54               ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-21 14:33                 ` Krzysztof Matusik
2006-06-14 15:32   ` Andy Furniss
2006-06-20  0:54   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-20 14:56     ` jamal
2006-06-20 15:09       ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-22 18:41         ` jamal
2006-06-23 14:32           ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-24 14:39             ` jamal
2006-06-26 11:21               ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-27 13:01                 ` jamal
2006-07-02  4:23                   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-07-02 13:59                     ` jamal
     [not found]   ` <1150287983.3246.27.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube>
     [not found]     ` <1150292693.5197.1.camel@jzny2>
     [not found]       ` <1150843471.17455.2.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube>
     [not found]         ` <15653CE98281AD4FBD7F70BCEE3666E53CD54A@comxexch01.comx.local>
     [not found]           ` <1151000966.5392.34.camel@jzny2>
2006-06-23 12:37             ` Russell Stuart
2006-06-23 15:21               ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-26  0:45                 ` Russell Stuart
2006-06-26 11:10                   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-27  6:19                     ` Russell Stuart
2006-06-27 17:18                       ` Patrick McHardy
2006-07-04 13:29                       ` Patrick McHardy
2006-07-04 19:29                         ` jamal
2006-07-04 23:53                           ` Patrick McHardy
2006-07-06  0:39                         ` Russell Stuart
2006-07-07  8:00                           ` Patrick McHardy
2006-07-10  8:44                             ` Russell Stuart
2006-06-24 14:13               ` jamal
2006-06-26  4:23                 ` Russell Stuart
2006-07-18  2:06                 ` Russell Stuart
2006-07-18 13:35                   ` jamal
2006-07-18 21:46                   ` Andy Furniss
2006-07-19  1:02                     ` Russell Stuart
2006-07-19 14:42                       ` Andy Furniss
2006-07-19 14:54                         ` Patrick McHardy
2006-07-19 20:26                         ` [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL (RTAB BUG) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-07-19 21:00                           ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-20  5:47                             ` Russell Stuart
2006-07-20 23:49                               ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2006-07-19 14:50                       ` [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL Patrick McHardy
2006-07-20  4:56                         ` Russell Stuart
2006-07-30 23:06                           ` Russell Stuart
2006-08-08 22:01                             ` Russell Stuart
2006-08-09 11:33                               ` jamal [this message]
2006-09-04 10:37                                 ` Russell Stuart
2006-06-14 14:27 ` Phillip Susi
2006-06-14 15:08   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2006-06-20  5:35 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-06-20  7:33   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1155123221.5130.23.camel@jzny2 \
    --to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=hawk@diku.dk \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=russell-tcatm@stuart.id.au \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).