From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [RFC][NET::SCHED]: cleanup qdisc_restart Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:57:27 -0400 Message-ID: <1155596247.6946.9.camel@jzny2> References: <1155408186.5091.46.camel@jzny2> <44E1DD5F.4020603@osdl.org> <20060814.140136.88477982.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-path: Received: from mx02.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.105]:14212 "EHLO mx02.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965023AbWHNW5d (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:57:33 -0400 Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21]) by mx02.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1GClNK-0007c0-4o for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:57:38 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060814.140136.88477982.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-14-08 at 14:01 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 07:42:39 -0700 > > > Please don't change the values because some older drvers still return 1 > > rather > > than NETDEV_TX_BUSY > > Unfortunately, this is probably very true. So we indeed cannot > change the NETDEV_TX_BUSY value. That slipped from the experiments i was trying out. I can use valid return codes. The question to ask though is: shouldnt we be having drivers use the mnemonics instead of values like 1? cheers, jamal