From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] [IPv6] address: Convert address notification to
	use rtnl_notify()
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:03:34 -0400
Message-ID: <1155611014.6946.82.camel@jzny2>
References: <E1GCnEZ-0006XU-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
	 <1155609965.6946.74.camel@jzny2>
Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>, tgraf@suug.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx03.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.106]:32167 "EHLO
	mx03.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751534AbWHODD6
	(ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:03:58 -0400
Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21])
	by mx03.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1GCpDm-0005I0-HM
	for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:04:02 -0400
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <1155609965.6946.74.camel@jzny2>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2006-14-08 at 22:46 -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-15-08 at 10:56 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Thats all the quagga
> and other folks were looking for in cases where it was ambigous. 
> 

Just to be clear, when Alexey says "that past discussion essentially
closed the question." he is correct and i did not, hopefully, insuniate
otherwise. The question i posed above is still valid though ;->

cheers,
jamal