From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] [IPv6] address: Convert address notification to use rtnl_notify() Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:08:57 -0400 Message-ID: <1155730137.5122.99.camel@jzny2> References: <20060815122300.GV14627@postel.suug.ch> <20060816105856.GW14627@postel.suug.ch> <20060816111240.GA28846@gondor.apana.org.au> <20060816114003.GY14627@postel.suug.ch> <20060816115747.GA29440@gondor.apana.org.au> <20060816120559.GZ14627@postel.suug.ch> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Herbert Xu , hasso@estpak.ee, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx03.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.106]:13731 "EHLO mx03.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751137AbWHPMJE (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:09:04 -0400 Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21]) by mx03.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1GDKCp-0002Ly-5c for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 08:09:07 -0400 To: Thomas Graf In-Reply-To: <20060816120559.GZ14627@postel.suug.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-16-08 at 14:05 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > Right, but he forgot the bits in IPv6 which I now fixed. The > changeset introducing those current->pid uses was definitely > simply wrong. I'm not questioning that :) Herbert, if you look at the thread as well I am no longer questioning that either ;-> cheers, jamal PS:- Would a topic of "things i wish netlink did better" be of interest for discussion (maybe for netconf)? (Un)fortunately, we are fixing some of them with genetlink;->