From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jamal Subject: Re: [PATCH][IPSEC]: Aggregate make_jiffies Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:13:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1155733994.5122.140.camel@jzny2> References: <1155693500.5122.39.camel@jzny2> <20060816023349.GA24174@gondor.apana.org.au> <1155697186.5122.43.camel@jzny2> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx02.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.105]:55789 "EHLO mx02.cybersurf.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175AbWHPNNS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:13:18 -0400 Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21]) by mx02.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1GDLCx-0006Ug-AX for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2006 09:13:19 -0400 To: Herbert Xu In-Reply-To: <1155697186.5122.43.camel@jzny2> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-15-08 at 22:59 -0400, jamal wrote: > > How about moving > > it to linux/jiffies.h and rewrite in the style of msec_to_jiffies? > > > > Is there something other than the boundary check already done you > foresee being made? If yes, do you wanna take a crack at it? Herbert, I actually dont know the answer that is why i am punting it to you;-> I would just move the whole thing to linux/jiffies.h as is but you seem to suggest there may be other boundary checks. If yes, go at it ;-> cheers, jamal