From: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]d80211: add hardware scan callback
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:34:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157096078.11534.4.camel@devlinux-hong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157092863.2878.13.camel@ux156>
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 14:41, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 11:37 +0800, Hong Liu wrote:
> >
> > + local->sta_scanning = 1;
> > + if (local->hw->hw_scan)
> > + return local->hw->hw_scan(dev, ssid, ssid_len);
> > +
>
> My question still stands, is it proper to assign sta_scanning to 1 even
> if the function returns an error?
>
> johannes
>
>
Thanks for point this out!
Change to only set sta_scanning to 1 if hw_scan successes.
Signed-off-by: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
diff --git a/include/net/d80211.h b/include/net/d80211.h
index 42fdbf7..1caa8a9 100644
--- a/include/net/d80211.h
+++ b/include/net/d80211.h
@@ -600,6 +600,10 @@ struct ieee80211_hw {
int (*passive_scan)(struct net_device *dev, int state,
struct ieee80211_scan_conf *conf);
+ /* Ask the hardware to service the scan request, no need to start
+ * the scan state machine in stack. */
+ int (*hw_scan)(struct net_device *dev, u8 *ssid, size_t len);
+
/* return low-level statistics */
int (*get_stats)(struct net_device *dev,
struct ieee80211_low_level_stats *stats);
@@ -906,6 +910,8 @@ void ieee80211_tx_led(int state, struct
*/
void ieee80211_rx_led(int state, struct net_device *dev);
+/* called by driver to notify scan status completed */
+void ieee80211_scan_completed(struct net_device *dev);
/* IEEE 802.11 defines */
diff --git a/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c b/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
index 557ba17..1f60a22 100644
--- a/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
+++ b/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
@@ -2410,6 +2410,29 @@ static int ieee80211_active_scan(struct
}
+void ieee80211_scan_completed(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct ieee80211_local *local = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
+ struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
+ union iwreq_data wrqu;
+
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: scan completed\n", dev->name);
+ local->sta_scanning = 0;
+ local->last_scan_completed = jiffies;
+
+ memset(&wrqu, 0, sizeof(wrqu));
+ wireless_send_event(dev, SIOCGIWSCAN, &wrqu, NULL);
+
+ if (sdata->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_IBSS) {
+ struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta = &sdata->u.sta;
+ if (!ifsta->bssid_set ||
+ (!ifsta->state == IEEE80211_IBSS_JOINED &&
+ !ieee80211_sta_active_ibss(dev)))
+ ieee80211_sta_find_ibss(dev, ifsta);
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_scan_completed);
+
static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void *ptr)
{
struct net_device *dev = ptr;
@@ -2418,7 +2441,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void
struct ieee80211_hw_modes *mode;
struct ieee80211_channel *chan;
int skip;
- union iwreq_data wrqu;
unsigned long next_delay = 0;
if (!local->sta_scanning)
@@ -2435,20 +2457,8 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void
"operational channel after scan\n",
dev->name);
}
- printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: scan completed\n", dev->name);
- local->sta_scanning = 0;
- local->last_scan_completed = jiffies;
- memset(&wrqu, 0, sizeof(wrqu));
- wireless_send_event(dev, SIOCGIWSCAN, &wrqu, NULL);
- if (sdata->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_IBSS) {
- struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata =
- IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
- struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta = &sdata->u.sta;
- if (!ifsta->bssid_set ||
- (ifsta->state == IEEE80211_IBSS_JOINED &&
- !ieee80211_sta_active_ibss(dev)))
- ieee80211_sta_find_ibss(dev, ifsta);
- }
+
+ ieee80211_scan_completed(dev);
return;
}
skip = !(local->enabled_modes & (1 << mode->mode));
@@ -2549,6 +2559,13 @@ int ieee80211_sta_req_scan(struct net_de
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: starting scan\n", dev->name);
+ if (local->hw->hw_scan) {
+ int rc = local->hw->hw_scan(dev, ssid, ssid_len);
+ if (!rc)
+ local->sta_scanning = 1;
+ return rc;
+ }
+
ieee80211_sta_save_oper_chan(dev);
local->sta_scanning = 1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-01 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-25 8:32 [PATCH 2/2]d80211: add hardware scan callback Hong Liu
2006-08-29 12:08 ` Johannes Berg
2006-08-30 17:10 ` Jiri Benc
2006-08-30 18:36 ` Mohamed Abbas
2006-09-01 3:37 ` Hong Liu
2006-09-01 6:41 ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-01 7:34 ` Hong Liu [this message]
2006-09-21 19:22 ` Jiri Benc
2009-04-06 15:12 ` oterito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1157096078.11534.4.camel@devlinux-hong \
--to=hong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).