netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]d80211: add hardware scan callback
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 15:34:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1157096078.11534.4.camel@devlinux-hong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1157092863.2878.13.camel@ux156>

On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 14:41, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 11:37 +0800, Hong Liu wrote:
> > 
> > +     local->sta_scanning = 1;
> > +     if (local->hw->hw_scan)
> > +             return local->hw->hw_scan(dev, ssid, ssid_len);
> > +
> 
> My question still stands, is it proper to assign sta_scanning to 1 even
> if the function returns an error?
> 
> johannes
> 
> 
Thanks for point this out!
Change to only set sta_scanning to 1 if hw_scan successes.


Signed-off-by: Hong Liu <hong.liu@intel.com>

diff --git a/include/net/d80211.h b/include/net/d80211.h
index 42fdbf7..1caa8a9 100644
--- a/include/net/d80211.h
+++ b/include/net/d80211.h
@@ -600,6 +600,10 @@ struct ieee80211_hw {
         int (*passive_scan)(struct net_device *dev, int state,
                             struct ieee80211_scan_conf *conf);
 
+	/* Ask the hardware to service the scan request, no need to start
+	 * the scan state machine in stack. */
+	int (*hw_scan)(struct net_device *dev, u8 *ssid, size_t len);
+
         /* return low-level statistics */
 	int (*get_stats)(struct net_device *dev,
 			 struct ieee80211_low_level_stats *stats);
@@ -906,6 +910,8 @@ void ieee80211_tx_led(int state, struct 
  */
 void ieee80211_rx_led(int state, struct net_device *dev);
 
+/* called by driver to notify scan status completed */
+void ieee80211_scan_completed(struct net_device *dev);
 
 /* IEEE 802.11 defines */
 
diff --git a/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c b/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
index 557ba17..1f60a22 100644
--- a/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
+++ b/net/d80211/ieee80211_sta.c
@@ -2410,6 +2410,29 @@ static int ieee80211_active_scan(struct 
 }
 
 
+void ieee80211_scan_completed(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	struct ieee80211_local *local = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
+	struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata = IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
+	union iwreq_data wrqu;
+
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: scan completed\n", dev->name);
+	local->sta_scanning = 0;
+	local->last_scan_completed = jiffies;
+
+	memset(&wrqu, 0, sizeof(wrqu));
+	wireless_send_event(dev, SIOCGIWSCAN, &wrqu, NULL);
+
+	if (sdata->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_IBSS) {
+		struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta = &sdata->u.sta;
+		if (!ifsta->bssid_set ||
+		    (!ifsta->state == IEEE80211_IBSS_JOINED &&
+		    !ieee80211_sta_active_ibss(dev)))
+			ieee80211_sta_find_ibss(dev, ifsta);
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(ieee80211_scan_completed);
+
 static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void *ptr)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = ptr;
@@ -2418,7 +2441,6 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void
 	struct ieee80211_hw_modes *mode;
 	struct ieee80211_channel *chan;
 	int skip;
-	union iwreq_data wrqu;
 	unsigned long next_delay = 0;
 
 	if (!local->sta_scanning)
@@ -2435,20 +2457,8 @@ static void ieee80211_sta_scan_work(void
 				       "operational channel after scan\n",
 				       dev->name);
 			}
-			printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: scan completed\n", dev->name);
-			local->sta_scanning = 0;
-			local->last_scan_completed = jiffies;
-			memset(&wrqu, 0, sizeof(wrqu));
-			wireless_send_event(dev, SIOCGIWSCAN, &wrqu, NULL);
-			if (sdata->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_IBSS) {
-				struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata =
-					IEEE80211_DEV_TO_SUB_IF(dev);
-				struct ieee80211_if_sta *ifsta = &sdata->u.sta;
-				if (!ifsta->bssid_set ||
-				    (ifsta->state == IEEE80211_IBSS_JOINED &&
-				     !ieee80211_sta_active_ibss(dev)))
-					ieee80211_sta_find_ibss(dev, ifsta);
-			}
+
+			ieee80211_scan_completed(dev);
 			return;
 		}
 		skip = !(local->enabled_modes & (1 << mode->mode));
@@ -2549,6 +2559,13 @@ int ieee80211_sta_req_scan(struct net_de
 
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: starting scan\n", dev->name);
 
+	if (local->hw->hw_scan) {
+		int rc = local->hw->hw_scan(dev, ssid, ssid_len);
+		if (!rc)
+			local->sta_scanning = 1;
+		return rc;
+	}
+
 	ieee80211_sta_save_oper_chan(dev);
 
 	local->sta_scanning = 1;

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-01  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-25  8:32 [PATCH 2/2]d80211: add hardware scan callback Hong Liu
2006-08-29 12:08 ` Johannes Berg
2006-08-30 17:10 ` Jiri Benc
2006-08-30 18:36   ` Mohamed Abbas
2006-09-01  3:37   ` Hong Liu
2006-09-01  6:41     ` Johannes Berg
2006-09-01  7:34       ` Hong Liu [this message]
2006-09-21 19:22         ` Jiri Benc
2009-04-06 15:12 ` oterito

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1157096078.11534.4.camel@devlinux-hong \
    --to=hong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).