From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [GENL]: Provide more information to userspace about registered genl families Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 14:25:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1157113517.2878.55.camel@ux156> References: <20060831212129.GF3470@postel.suug.ch> <1157060812.5297.51.camel@jzny2> <1157093281.2878.19.camel@ux156> <1157113331.5057.67.camel@jzny2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Graf , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:2539 "EHLO sipsolutions.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751151AbWIAMYq (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:24:46 -0400 To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1157113331.5057.67.camel@jzny2> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 08:22 -0400, jamal wrote: > Seems you may be talking about capabilities more than filtering? yes, I had sort of thought filtering would be that, but now that you say it I get the point :) > Sorry, I havent had time to look at that code (is it in Daves tree?); No, it's not in any tree yet. > if > i understand you correctly - you have a superset of commands, and some > users of those commands can only implement a subset? precisely. johannes