From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell Stuart Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 20:37:34 +1000 Message-ID: <1157366254.12387.16.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> References: <1150278004.26181.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1150286766.5233.15.camel@jzny2> <1150287983.3246.27.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <1150292693.5197.1.camel@jzny2> <1150843471.17455.2.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <15653CE98281AD4FBD7F70BCEE3666E53CD54A@comxexch01.comx.local> <1151000966.5392.34.camel@jzny2> <1151066247.4217.254.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <1151158431.6716.95.camel@jzny2> <1153188409.13145.5.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <44BD56A4.9090002@andyfurniss.entadsl.com> <1153270932.4242.60.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <44BE46A6.8000207@trash.net> <1153371364.4231.61.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <1154300766.4236.5.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <1155074476.4270.16.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube> <1155123221.5130.23.camel@jzny2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lists@andyfurniss.entadsl.com, Jesper Dangaard Brouer , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger , Patrick McHardy Return-path: Received: from 58.105.229.78.optusnet.com.au ([58.105.229.78]:64461 "EHLO adsl-kenny.stuart.id.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751381AbWIDKjL (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Sep 2006 06:39:11 -0400 To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1155123221.5130.23.camel@jzny2> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 07:33 -0400, jamal wrote: > > Jamal - unless there are other outstanding issues I have > > missed or someone has had second thoughts this means you > > should be OK with the patch going in. Can we get it into > > Dave M's tree now? > > Hi Russell, > > My apologies; at some point i lost track of the discussion because > things seemed under control. > Lets hear from Patrick - I have a lot of faith in him; i just happen to > know he is occupied elsewhere as we speak (which may explain his > silence). So please be a little patient with him. In the meantime please > dont be discouraged in continuing to contribute - sometimes this is how > things go. > > You are right that if there is no generic solution from Patrick we > should not hold your patch. My understanding of Patrick's patch is it > covers for your case; i may have misread that given you and him are > still discussing the differences. > > Perhaps one approach is to push your patch in first and then when > Patrick is ready he can operate on that. Patrick, thoughts? Jamal, I think its time to assume Patrick has lost interest. Is it possible to get this in now? -- VGER BF report: U 0.542723