From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Alternate WE-21 support (core API)
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:42:35 +0200
Message-ID: <1157611356.2857.0.camel@ux156>
References: <20060830005655.GA8405@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
	 <1157031138.16040.17.camel@ux156> <20060831135112.GA6097@jm.kir.nu>
	 <1157032805.16040.21.camel@ux156>  <20060906205538.GA29767@tuxdriver.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@cc.hut.fi>, jt@hpl.hp.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Javier Achirica <achirica@gmail.com>,
	Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>,
	"James P. Ketrenos" <ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>, Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@ruslug.rutgers.edu>,
	Jeroen Vreeken <pe1rxq@amsat.org>,
	Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>,
	Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>,
	Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:44712 "EHLO
	sipsolutions.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750829AbWIGGmW
	(ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:42:22 -0400
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060906205538.GA29767@tuxdriver.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 16:55 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:

> Is this patch acceptable to the group?  Does it make things better?
> Or worse?  Did I leave-out anything that should still go in?  Did I
> take too much?

Looks good to me.

johannes