From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: mabbas <mabbas@linux.intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jkm@devicescape.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [d80211] some issues regarding iwconfig parameters sequence
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:34:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1158240884.2634.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4508717B.8060403@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 14:00 -0700, mabbas wrote:
> Hi
> I have some problem connecting if I don't follow some parameters
> sequence in iwconfig command for example if I issues the following
> # iwconfig wlan0 essid test ap xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
> #iwconfif wlan0 channel 9
Any reason you don't stick all the commands on one iwconfig line, or why
you don't do the channel first? Some operations with WEXT are
undefined, and I think command ordering is one of them. However, I
believe that the card/driver should be keeping all the attributes set,
and any time an attribute changes that would break a current association
or operation (like locking the channel), then the card/driver should be
restarting association/auth with the new attribute set.
> in d80211 if essid and bssid set it will start authentication with
> default channel and authentication will timeout then after the second
> command kicks in to tune to the right channel the retry counter of
> authentication will be at maximum and we wont authenticate, same problem
> exist for IBSS it will start searching but once we call #iwconfif wlan0
> channel 9 this will stop scanning and we stop IBSS searching . I
That seems wrong; once you set the channel, d80211 should be resetting
the current assoc/auth stuff, and restarting the association with the
current parameters/attributes from scratch, but now only on channel 9.
WEXT didn't really have a good way to "package" a full set of
association/auth parameters; the commit-handler stuff kind of did that,
but if the commands got broken up then the semantics of what happened
when were pretty undefined.
Dan
> attached a patch for workaround this problem. I am not sure this is the
> right way to fix just attached to illustrate the problem.
> Mohamed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-14 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-13 21:00 [d80211] some issues regarding iwconfig parameters sequence mabbas
2006-09-14 13:34 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2006-09-14 17:48 ` mabbas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1158240884.2634.4.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=jkm@devicescape.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=mabbas@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).