From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: softmac mtu Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:39:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1159429162.2648.0.camel@ux156> References: <20060925200125.GF16949@tuxdriver.com> <20060927143905.721ddf3e@griffin.suse.cz> <1159365434.451a833ae7728@imp3-g19.free.fr> <1159365316.2698.40.camel@ux156> <451AB215.3080500@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jiri Benc , "John W. Linville" , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:7809 "EHLO sipsolutions.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751753AbWI1Hir (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:38:47 -0400 To: matthieu castet In-Reply-To: <451AB215.3080500@free.fr> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 19:17 +0200, matthieu castet wrote: > > 2304, I think, as that's > > synonym sMaxMsduLng Integer = 2304; /* max octets in an MSDU */ > > > > Yes but if it is bigger the frame get framented at the 802.11 layer : in > theory we could put mtu (IP max packet size) a big as we want [1]. No, you're confusing MPDU and MSDU. Or I am :) Please try to read the spec as well. johannes