From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Fox Subject: Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64 Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:25:09 -0500 Message-ID: <1160079909.29690.40.camel@flooterbu> References: <20060928014623.ccc9b885.akpm@osdl.org> <200610052027.02208.ak@suse.de> <20061005185217.GF20551@in.ibm.com> <200610052108.55208.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vgoyal@in.ibm.com, Badari Pulavarty , Martin Bligh , Andrew Morton , lkml , netdev@vger.kernel.org, kmannth@us.ibm.com, Andy Whitcroft , Mel Gorman Return-path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.142]:2508 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751255AbWJEUZO (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:25:14 -0400 To: Andi Kleen In-Reply-To: <200610052108.55208.ak@suse.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 21:08 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Mel might want to take a look (and perhaps > also cut down a little on the ugly printks ...) I tested a patch from Mel which backs out the arch independent zone sizing and got the same results (to my inexperienced eye). I've sent him the boot log to verify they really are the same as without this back-out. -- Steve Fox IBM Linux Technology Center