From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:21:22 +0100 Message-ID: <1160922082.5732.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1160161519800-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <20061013214135.8fbc9f04.akpm@osdl.org> <20061014140249.GL11633@parisc-linux.org> <20061014134855.b66d7e65.akpm@osdl.org> <20061015032000.GP11633@parisc-linux.org> <20061015070809.978C714552@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: matthew@wil.cx, akpm@osdl.org, val_henson@linux.intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Return-path: Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:64670 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964838AbWJONzB (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Oct 2006 09:55:01 -0400 To: David Brownell In-Reply-To: <20061015070809.978C714552@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Ar Sul, 2006-10-15 am 00:08 -0700, ysgrifennodd David Brownell: > Since it's not an error, there should be no such printk ... which > is exactly how it's coded above. The underlying bug is that someone marked pci_set_mwi must-check, that's wrong for most of the drivers that use it. If you remove the must check annotation from it then the problem and a thousand other spurious warnings go away.