From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom St Denis Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:31:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1161725580.95543.1358782288077.JavaMail.root@elliptictech.com> References: <1358782113.21576.28.camel@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Dillow , Borislav Petkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from mx.scalarmail.ca ([98.158.95.75]:15096 "EHLO ironport-01.sms.scalar.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756211Ab3AUPbe (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:31:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1358782113.21576.28.camel@gandalf.local.home> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Rostedt" > To: "Tom St Denis" > Cc: "David Dillow" , "Borislav Petkov" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > netdev@vger.kernel.org > Sent: Monday, 21 January, 2013 10:28:33 AM > Subject: Re: IPsec AH use of ahash > > When I send a patch to another maintainer, and they tell me to fix > the > way I did the comments, I don't complain. I fix the comments and > resend. Which is less of a problem when there is a timeliness factor. In the business world people move on and don't work at that pace. Anyways, neither here nor there now. Tom