From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: [PATCH] hostap_plx: fix CIS verification Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:48:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1161737289.29298.6.camel@dv> References: <1161382815.5803.2.camel@dv> <20061021011943.GC6140@jm.kir.nu> <20061025003707.GB7340@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hostap@shmoo.com Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:37967 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161295AbWJYAsK (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:48:10 -0400 To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <20061025003707.GB7340@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 20:37 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > Will you be refactoring this patch? Or do you disagree with Jouni's > assessment? OK, give me an hour to produce a better patch. My patch has an advantage of being simple and of fixing exactly one thing, but if Jouni feels more comfortable with an additional check, I'll add it. I don't have Coverity to check, and I think the results of Coverity were misinterpreted. It doesn't know anything about CIS structure. Anyway, let me just check Jouni's suggestion on a real PLX card. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin